Detroit Free Press: Private groups push Detroit ahead | Freep.com
Click here to continue reading.
Labels: InTheNews, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, regionalism
Labels: leadership_next, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
“We Detroiters continue to carry the heavy weight of our segregationist past, and it is an awesome burden,” he said. “We can shrug it off, but only if we’re willing to try.”
“We need to get beyond some of the rhetoric and break down barriers,” said Reginald Turner, member of law firm Clark Hill plc in Detroit.
“It is every one of our responsibilities to contribute to having a healthy community,” said Sandra Pierce, president and CEO of Charter One Bank in Michigan and Indiana.
“This integration of various factors is one of the reasons I believe One D has it right,” Earley said.
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
By: WWJ and the Great Lakes IT Report
Published: May 31, 2007
The One D regional economic development continued Thursday morning at the Detroit Regional Chamber’s Mackinac Policy Conference with a breakfast meeting of the One D leadership team.
The session covered the five initiatives of the One D effort – economic prosperity, educational preparedness, quality of life, race relations and regional transit.
Educational preparedness and regional transit received the most sharp commentary.
The educational preparedness effort includes a benchmark of getting every child in the region to read at grade level. Michael Brennan, president and CEO of the United Way for Southeastern Michigan, likened the effort that will require to the effort surrounding Super Bowl XL in 2006.
“Edsel (Ford II) said yesterday that we’re pretty good at mobilizing for events like the Super Bowl,” Brennan said. “We coordinated volunteers at the United Way. We had 8,000 volunteers, with 2,000 more on a waiting list, to stand on street corners in the rain to direct people to Ford Field that they (the volunteers) weren’t even going to get close to. Meanwhile, we have 8,000 third graders not reading at grade level. This is a changeable condition. It’s a matter of recruiting the mentors. We can do this.”
As for regional transportation, Detroit Regional Chamber president and CEO Richard E. Blouse Jr. blasted the region’s lack of a true regional transit system.
Blouse said he’s visited sophisticated, integrated air-rail-bus transit systems in cities from Amsterdam to Frankfort, Germany to Beijing to Seoul to Hyderabad, and he’s come away with the dispiriting thought that “We’re dead. These people are decades ahead of us.”
Blouse said that means that “We have to do it (regional transit) and we have to do it now. This is ridiculous. It’s time we put the things that stand in the way aside. A regional transit system has to go to all communities. This opt-out thing is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard of. You can’t have a regional transit system if one community in the middle can opt out of it.”
As for race relations, panelists pointed out that race is less and less an issue for the young, and that those for whom it’s still a problem need to learn to celebrate diversity.
And the group said the region needs to learn to give itself enough credit for a quality of life that includes plenty of parks, lakes, health institutions and low living costs.
“All of us have lost economic development projects to one place or another because somebody perceived the quality of life as being superior somewhere else,” Blouse said. “Quality of life needs to be elevated as a priority, to be raised in terms of understanding quality of life and its importance to economic prosperity.”
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Detroit's county leaders and Windsor, Ontario officials pledged to support the One D regional development initiative during the so-called Big Five session Friday at the Detroit Regional Chamber's Mackinac Policy Conference.
Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson, who's opposed some regional initiatives in the past, touted his county's efforts, including the eight-county Oakland County-run law enforcement information network CLEMIS and Automation Alley, which he started in 1999.
Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick said that when it comes to regionalism, "We all need each other to be successful," and that the region needs to "share services and opportunities. I believe there are several more opportunities for regional cooperation."
Kilpatrick pointed out that Detroit "never would have joined Automation Alley 15 years ago because it's an Oakland County thing. We're in it now, let's market the region as a whole, as the next place to build your business in technology or alternative energy."
And Wayne County Executive Robert Ficano said that there's simply no way metro Detroit will survive "unless we go to the world now as a region."
The leaders also backed efforts to create an "aerotropolis" between Detroit Metro and Willow Run airports. Ficano said the county came up with the plan after studying airports in Asia and Europe, prompting this barb from Kilpatrick, who's been criticized for his travel expenses: "It's good that you got to travel, Bob, to Amsterdam and Hong Kong to see all this. Because they don't let me travel, Bob. I'm glad you can bring it back for all of us ... Y'all can go anywhere you want. I gotta hop around in a circle."
As for expectations of unions in the state, Kilpatrick said state officials must emulate what Detroit has done, getting major concessions from labor groups and cutting $300 million from the budget, and some wins at binding arbitration. He also said Granholm has shown leadership and is "ready to attack some of the structural problems in the general fund." Other leaders said they believe that union leaders acknowledge that something has to be done with retirement and health care costs.
The crowd also responded with applause from a suggestion from WJR moderator Paul W. Smith to the effect that maybe term limits aren't such a great idea.
-- By Matt Roush
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
In his opening remarks Wednesday, One D champion Edsel Ford II asked for audience members to make regionalism a way of life. Afterward, a panel of members from the participating groups in One D discussed progress and challenges.
“Parts working together in harmony is an apt description of the communities of the Detroit region, when we are at our very best,” Ford said. “The way we pulled together for last year’s Super Bowl is just one recent example. But that was an effort built around an occasion. For the communities of regional Detroit to shine their brightest, we need more than an occasional effort … we need to embrace regionalism. We need to make it a way of life.”
For One D, a group of six regional civic groups that are working together on five priorities for the region, to succeed, each organization needs to exhibit organizational selflessness, Ford said. The groups behind One D are the Detroit Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau, the Detroit Regional Chamber, Detroit Renaissance Inc. , New Detroit Inc., United Way for Southeastern Michigan and the Cultural Alliance of Southeastern Michigan.
The five priorities are economic prosperity, educational preparedness, regional transit, race relations and quality of life, with regional collaboration as an umbrella over all.
Maud Lyon, founding director of the Cultural Alliance, said “One D is about eliminating duplication of efforts.”
And, by laying regionalism over the top with Ford as “the guru of regional collaboration,” said Richard Blouse, president and CEO of the Detroit Regional Chamber, the interrelated priorities can move along faster.
Doug Rothwell, president of Detroit Renaissance, said the five priorities are at different stages of evolution and some will require more change. And Michael Brennan, president and CEO of the United Way, compared the region’s movement to a One D framework to a technology upgrade.
“We’ve operated for a long time on DOS,” he said. “We’re trying to move to Windows.”
Ford, when interviewed after the panel discussion, said One D next needs to get more corporate leaders, nonprofit leaders and elected officials behind the effort. County executives, for example, would be a great addition. Ideally, Ford said, even after progress is made on priorities, the One D work plan can be updated and continue instead of disbanding.
“The theory is: This is a process,” he said.
For now, until more specifics about business support are announced, including two additional sessions planned at the conference, supporters can speak positively about the region and find ways to collaborate more often, panelists said.
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, One D, regionalism
Labels: InTheNews, regionalism, Research
Ed.'s Note: What follows are some of the results from the second in a series of metromode surveys that will help create a blueprint for changing the region. The next survey will appear May 17th in the Regional Activation Zone — metromode's place to get inspired, informed and connected to the community, found in the lower left corner of the metromode home page. To read more about the zone, click here.
While each of these organizations works to meet specific objectives of its own, all recognize that they have a collective responsibility to the region as well. Input and data gained from the community, government officials and other organizations outside of One D are extremely important factors in the success of this unprecedented transformation effort, and will be used by One D to build a one-vision, one-plan blueprint for transforming Southeast Michigan. The final blueprint is expected to be unveiled at the 2007 Mackinac Policy Conference.
As part of this data gathering effort, Issue Media Group (the publishers of Model D and metromode) and United Way for Southeastern Michigan have partnered to regularly survey the Detroit region, on behalf of the One D partnership and each of its member organizations, regarding key quality of life and economic issues in order to get a better handle on " the pulse of southeast Michigan."
We want to serve up surveys that will better help us, and others, understand what our residents are thinking. We want to open this capacity to other organizations that are working to make the Detroit region a better place to live and work. We are at an important crossroads for this region and we want to be able to measure our progress through the opinions of its residents. We hope you will want to join us on this journey.
We will be delivering a new survey each month. Upon review and analysis, we will select the most pertinent questions and repeat them at regular intervals over the next several years. In this way we will be able to track perceptual change over time and match that to the demographic and economic indicators that will comprise the One D Report Card.
Our first survey appeared in the March 1st issue of metromode and was designed to obtain feedback on "quality of life" issues in Southeast Michigan. This report provides the results of that survey.
On March 22 we launched a survey designed to obtain feedback related to the new "branding" effort from the Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau. Late in April we hope to look at Race Relations in Metro Detroit. Future surveys will delve into Art and Culture, Transportation, Education, Economic Opportunities and more. We welcome suggestions from organizations and individuals regarding other issues of importance and hope that you will join us as we take the "Pulse of Metro Detroit."
Quality of Life in Metropolitan Detroit
Our first survey addressed a number of Quality of Life issues in Metro Detroit. Over 1,000 persons took the time to complete the survey during the three weeks it was available. This report provides a summary of the responses received, and ends with a brief overview of respondent demographics.
The first question asked the following:
Using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "very satisfied" and 1 means "very dissatisfied," please rate your satisfaction with each of the following in the Southeast Michigan region – and in Your Community:
The following only address the Southeast Michigan region
-Redevelopment/revitalization of urban core communities in the region
-Management of suburban growth and development in the region
Figure 1. Percent of Respondents Answering "Very or Somewhat Satisfied" for the Region

Figure 2. Percent of Respondents Answering "Very or Somewhat Dissatisfied" for the Region

Figures 1 and 2 paint a very clear picture of the issues that Detroit area respondents feel are strongly present and those that they feel are lacking in the region as a whole. Over half of respondents indicated satisfaction with the access to arts and cultural activities, access to financial services, and the availability of quality food. The only other category to rise above 40percent in satisfaction was the " quality of public services." On the dissatisfaction side of the aisle, nearly four of every five respondents stated that they were dissatisfied with the availability of public transportation. This was followed by recognition of the lack of coordinated efforts tomanage suburban growth while working to redevelop and revitalize our urban core communities. Two other transportation-related issues also exceeded a 40 percent level of dissatisfaction –" transportation services for elderly and disabled' and general " traffic flow."
We also asked respondents to rank the majority of these issues from the perspective of their own communities. Suburban growth and urban revitalization were only asked in a regional context.
Figure 3. Percent of Respondents Answering "Very or Somewhat Satisfied" for Their Community

Figure 4. Percent of Respondents Answering "Very or Somewhat Dissatisfied" for Their Community

The results provided some interesting counterpoints to the regional opinions – a result similar to that found when respondents look at politics on the national and local level. In general, respondents show greater satisfaction, and less dissatisfaction, at the smaller geographic level. Services – both public (government) and private (food and finances) received high satisfaction ratings. The high preponderance of arts and culture in Detroit tended to lower the satisfaction score for this issue. Transportation, however, remained the principal issue of concern – garnering dissatisfaction responses from over 70 percent of the respondents.
Due to concerns about public safety and the lack of services – particularly grocery stores – in Detroit, we took a separate look at how Detroit residents answered this question. Only 42 percent were satisfied with the availability of quality food, while 34 percent expressed satisfaction with the quality of public safety services. On the negative side, Detroiters agreed that public transportation leaves a great deal to be desired – 71 percent were dissatisfied, with 47percent of responses being " very dissatisfied."
We next asked respondents to consider the issues in Question 1 and tell us:
Which THREE of these items do you think should receive the most emphasis from community leaders over the next THREE Years?
The results are shown in Figure 5. Consistent with the views expressed in Question 1,respondents overwhelmingly listed Public Transportation as the issue that should receive emphasis from community leaders. Thirty-eight percent of respondents listed this as a "first priority," while 81 percent of all respondents listed it as one of their three top issues. Coming in second was the need to invest in the redevelopment/revitalization of Detroit and our other older, urban core communities. An assessment of the quality of public safety services, and improvements where necessary, came in a close third, followed by the issue of managing suburban growth and development.
The importance of these responses is that they point to issues that we must look at on a regional basis. We cannot continue to expect individual leaders to solve the problems. Rather, we must work across historical geographic and racial lines to get the job done. Respondents are tired of the "rhetoric" and want to see "action."
Figure 5. Percent of Total Responses – Three Items for Community Leader Emphasis

Our next question asked the following:
Several items that may influence your perception of living in the Southeast Michigan region are listed below. Please rate each item on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "very satisfied" and 1 means "very unsatisfied."
Figure 6 provides a summary of the two ends of the spectrum – 5 (very satisfied) and 1 (very dissatisfied).While dissatisfaction ruled the day for most of the factors listed, respondents did show a great deal of satisfaction with the "quality of the region's post-secondary education" and the " availability of arts and cultural amenities." 72 percent of respondents were satisfied (very or somewhat) with our post-secondary educational opportunities, while 58% were satisfied with the region's arts and cultural opportunities.
On the other end of the spectrum, only 7 percent of respondents were satisfied with the "availability of quality jobs" (77% were dissatisfied), and only 10 percent were satisfied with "how the region values education and retains talent" (69% were dissatisfied).
Figure 6. Percent of Total Responses – Three Items for Community Leader Emphasis

We followed up the ranking question with the following:
Which THREE of these reasons will have the most impact on your decision to stay in the Southeast Michigan Region for the next 10 years?
An analysis of the results (Figure 7) spells trouble for our region. The availability of quality jobs far outdistanced any other response with 84 percent of all respondents listing it in their top 3 – and 48 percent listing it as number 1. The quality of public schools came in distant second at 48 percent, with regional values of education and talent retention placing third at 38 percent. All three of these issues ranked very low in their "satisfaction ratings."
Figure 7. Percent of Respondents Who Listed Item as Impacting Decision to Stay in SE Michigan

We also found that a number of respondents (almost 9 percent) wanted to provided other issues that were of importance to them. While they covered a wide range of issues, the primary categories were family, crime, cost-of-living, taxes and transportation.
The next question asked respondents to do the following:
Please rate the Southeast Michigan region on a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 means "excellent" and 1 means "poor" with regard to each of the following:
Figure 8. Percent Distribution of Responses Rating SE Michigan Region by Category

While respondents were stingy on giving an excellent rating to any of our quality of life categories, the region was rated positively by at least 40 percent of respondents as "a place to live" and as "a place to raise children." Almost 35 percent of respondents rated the overall quality of life positively. On the negative side, almost 80 percent of respondents rated the region as below average or poor in the area of "how well the region works together." "Planning for the future" and "the overall image" also came out on the negative end for almost 70 percent of respondents.
While the image is being worked on by a number of organizations, with the Detroit MetroConvention and Visitors Bureau (DMCVB) taking the lead in changing our brand, the lowratings for regional collaboration and planning should sound a clarion call to all " regional leaders." The ability to attract and retain young, educated residents and thereby build a knowledge-based economy that is attractive to a wide range of individuals and companies requires that we begin to work together as a region and develop regional plans for land use, transportation – public/mass and highways, housing, cultural amenities, and much more.
Our final question asked the following:
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "very safe" and 1 means "very unsafe," please rate how safe you feel in the following situations:
Figure 9. Percent Distribution of Responses on Feelings of Safety by Location

Southeast Michigan residents generally feel safe in their neighborhoods, communities, and throughout Southeast Michigan. The only area where safety was an issue was in the City of Detroit. Nearly three in five (57 percent) respondents expressed feeling "unsafe" or "very unsafe" in the City of Detroit. An analysis by geography shows that Detroit residents feel somewhat safer in their city than nonresidents – 21% vs. 15%. Nevertheless, 50 percent of Detroit residents reported feeling "unsafe" or "very unsafe," as compared to 60 percent of nonresidents.
It is obvious from these results that the image of Detroit must be changed by addressing the issue of crime and safety. A previous study of Crime in Downtown Detroit by this author showed that the core of the city was safer than many communities in Southeast Michigan, as well as other downtowns in cities across the country.
Mayor Kilpatrick made crime a major topic of his 2007 State of the City addres